I’ve had really good luck asking random people to do work for me, so I’m going to try it again.
RFC6698 defines the DANE protocol for attaching information to DNSSEC-secured DNS. Notably, you can validate SSL certificates via DNS. This is a game-changer. The key here is the TLSA DNS record.
If you have the newest version of the add-on installed, sites like https://www.dnssec.michaelwlucas.com/ show up as secure. There is no “invalid certificate” warning. That’s because I’ve published a TLSA record for this zone, telling the browser that the certificate with fingerprint such-and-such on this port on this host is trustworthy. (Install the plugin from the github source, not from the xpi on the site.)
The interesting thing about this add-on is that it uses libunbound to perform DNSSEC validation at the client. Your local DNS servers don’t need to support DNSSEC. All you need to hack on this plugin is a desktop.
But the add-on doesn’t support BSD — it’s Linux, MS, and Mac only. The add-on authors don’t have time for BSD support, but gave me a couple hints on how to implement it. The plugin can’t find libunbound on BSD.
That seems like it would be easy to do. I’m capable of building the add-on from source, but I’ve never programmed any add-ons before. The source code looks like it’s easy to hack, but my efforts all segfaulted Firefox. Obviously, I need more expertise.
So, if you know anything about Firefox add-ons, or have ever wanted to hack on them, this is your chance.
DANE and TLSA are the killer applications for DNSSEC. The ability to validate cryptographic certificates via DNS is a game changer. (Cliche, but true.) You can have separate certificates for separate ports on a host. With DANE, there’s no longer any need for a self-signed certificate to be a disadvantage.Stalk me on social media